|
TV literary reviewer Georges starts receiving anonymous packages, containing videos of himself with his family - shot secretly from the street - and disturbing drawings with obscure meanings. Gradually, the footage on the tapes becomes more personal, suggesting that the sender has known Georges for some time. Georges and his family feel increasingly threatened, but as no direct attack has been made the police refuse to help. The latest psychological thriller from critically acclaimed director Michael Haneke.
|
Rated:
|
[ MA ]
BRIEF STRONG VIOLENCE
|
|
Cinema release:
|
4 May 2006
|
|
DVD release:
|
11 Oct 2006
|
|
Director:
|
Michael Haneke
|
|
Running time:
|
113 mins
|
|
Stars:
|
Juliette Binoche, Daniel Auteuil
|
|
Links:
|
Official Site
IMDb
Rotten Tomatoes
|
What we say
|
Seek it out
What would you do if someone was watching your every move, leaving clues that hinted at something terrible you'd done in your past and threatening the safety of your family?
That's the question posed in "Hidden", a drama about a man who's haunted by a mysterious enemy. But this is no run-of-the-mill stalker flick; "Hidden" is a muted and subtle thriller that conveys deeply political themes.
Filmmaker Michael Haneke scored the Best Director award at the 2005 Cannes Film Festival, and he deserves the accolade. "Hidden" doesn't use any music or special effects, but is still incredibly suspenseful.
Georges (Daniel Auteuil) is the host of a TV talk show about books. He lives in a quiet, up-market neighbourhood with his wife, Anne (Juliette Binoche), and his 12-year-old son, Pierrot (Lester Makedonsky).
One day, Georges and Anne are sent an anonymous videotape showing surveillance footage of their house. More tapes soon arrive, accompanied by mysterious and gruesome drawings: a child coughing up blood, and a rooster with its head cut off.
When a videotape of Georges' childhood home arrives in the mail, he becomes convinced the tapes are being sent by someone he wronged when he was a boy, and sets out to solve the mystery as his once-peaceful life unravels around him.
During its first half, "Hidden" seems like it's shaping up to be one of the very best movies of the year. All the five-star elements are there: beautiful direction, a compelling plot, and a chilling sense of intrigue and suspense.
The performances are top-shelf. Auteuil perfectly balances the growing fear and inherent arrogance of his character, and Binoche is amazing as a worried mother; even the tiniest flicker of expression on her face is immensely sympathetic.
So it's too bad that something in "Hidden" slips at around two-thirds through. The gripping suspense suddenly cools off as the characters begin to feel like stand-ins for the film's political themes, instead of the believable people they were in the first half.
"Hidden" is almost redeemed by some excellent scenes in its conclusion - one in particular is startling, confronting and memorable. But by then it feels like the damage has already been done, and the film winds down into an unsatisfying conclusion.
This isn't one for moviegoers who like everything wrapped up in a neat package. The ambiguous ending made me want to stand up and scream in frustration, but the clever direction and compelling premise nevertheless make "Hidden" a film worth finding.
|
|
|
|
Find more info on Hidden with Bing Search
|
What you say
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a review
|

What you say
Fascinating but frustrating
   
Hidden is the operative word for this one, also frustrating would be a substitute. But undoubtedly it is well acted by the excellent Daniel Auteil and beautiful Juliette Binoche though looking less glam than usual, in her housewife part.
Plus there is a deviously clever plot, which breaks new ground in many ways, and some real instant shock scenes. But the sudden and obscure ending left me still wondering who sent the damned videotapes anyhow, and who could have filmed them in that way? For me the answer remained quite hidden.
But full marks for trying, it is typically good French Cinema, and certainly for most of the length keeps you held to the seat. Just don't get too comfortable because you might be annoyed watching that long scene under the end credits which is supposed to explain all. And indeed is this last scene yet another videotape?
Jaybee
Melbourne, VIC
11 Jun 2006
OK, but not deserving of the accolades
I had high expectations of this movie due to my fondness and admiration of French cinema. Added to that my appreciation of the acting abilities of Daniel Autiel and the very many accolades that this movie has received set me up for unrealistic expectations.
It didn't turn out to be anything close to what I had imagined. From the first frame I knew that I was going to be let down. It was almost as if I had expected to be watching a thriller or a drama centered around some mysterious events unfolding around a commonplace dwelling in Paris.
Instead, the movie told the story of a childhood mendacity and malice that led to reprecussions decades later. No explanation of what triggered the denouement all those years later and no understanding of why childhood malice should trigger such a violent unfolding when the memory had almost become irrelevant.
That is not to say that this applies in every case. It is a well-documented fact that childhood pedophilia will trigger violent memories sometimes decades later. But this was not the case or the expected reaction.
All in all I felt that this was an irrelevant movie rendered even more irrelevant by the story it told. Which goes to show you yet once again that awards and critics praise = nothing. Ultimatley it is your taste and affinity to the subject matter that counts.
If I may, if you are going to see one movie this year, just the on go see Separate Lies. A movie like that comes along once in a decade and I haven't seen one this good since, well I can't remember.
Eddie
Coogee, NSW
11 Jun 2006
Thought Provoking
   
This is a challenging and disturbing movie.
Superbly acted and directed, the film is shot and edited with deliberate, almost childish simplicity. No balanced lighting, fast cuts, CGI or chase scenes here. Just a gradual build to a horrific scene that left the lady in the row behind hysterical. There are so many layers here, all relevant to today, to us all. I had to remind myself that "It's only a movie. It's not real."
Or is it?
Be sure not to miss the last scene. Look where you normally wouldn't (not at the female in the foreground like I did). There is something hidden there.
A possibility perhaps?
David Burton
Sydney, NSW
30 May 2006
A masterpiece
   
This is one of the best films I've seen in years. Shocking and brilliant, it plays both as an intriguing, psychological thriller and as a metaphorical critique of middle class guilt. The trick is not to put to much stock in the surface answers of the thriller. The answers it provides in its underlying structure are far more interesting.
The whole film deals with an underlying class guilt pervading the lives of the middle class characters, which manifests into a sustained deflection of the traumatic kernal of their reality. Think about how many times characters say "Nothing" to enquiries about what's wrong (beginning with the first two lines of the film) or when Georges almost runs into the African biker (their subsequent argument is resolved with a willful acceptance of blindness: "We weren't looking and you weren't looking").
Haneke shoots the film in a flat, observational style which means that you constantly have to be looking for the meaning in the frame yourself (especially that killer last shot...look closer) but also makes sudden narrative events, such as the twist towards the end, absolutely traumatising - I can't remember being so shocked and psychologically ripped apart in a scene.
This is a deeply unsettling and complex film that will have you talking about it for days afterwards.
Dave Guzman
Sydney, NSW
12 May 2006
Fine French film
Frankly the performances are top-notch. Yet another example of how the French can actually make good movies. But somehow after a while the build-up to the end slows down. It perhaps shows the fact that maybe the screenwriter ran out of ideas on how to smoothly execute the plot. The plot in itself is nothing new, just a new take on the whole stalker genre really. Just another one of those examples that moviemakers are running out of ideas again, but all in all a good effort in delivering a solid, well made movie.
Sub
Sydney, NSW
11 May 2006
|
|
|
|
MOVIEFIX Tools
Get a snapshot of this week's movies straight to your inbox. Delivered each Thursday, the newsletter includes:
- New releases
- Film festivals
- Latest reviews
- News and gossip
- Competitions
If you have not already registered with yourMovies,
sign up
now to receive our weekly newsletter.
|